Nerds, geeks and squares make for good company

It is amazing what passes for education today.

A relative of mine was celebrating her recent graduation, as a very popular girl with honors. While discussing an upcoming Fourth of July celebration, we were remarking how courageous our forefathers must have been to sign such a seditious document. She had no idea what we were talking about. When we told her the Fourth was dedicated to the signing of the Declaration of Independence, she was incredulous. When questioned as to what she thought the holiday was for she replied, "I thought it was to celebrate fireworks."

I once gave a ride to some relatives who were living on the edges of the drug culture. While we were riding along I played some classical music on the radio. You would have thought I had committed murder, the complaints were so demonstrative, and the accusations so sharp.

One of my daughters sat reading Shakespeare, Jane Austen and other true classics on her break at her first job. One of her coworkers remarked, "You mean you read books?"

Being ignorant and uneducated is all the rage. You cannot study or enjoy any pursuit other than shopping or entertainment or sports without feeling the sanction of others. If you paint or spend hours studying about war ships or conquering a musical instrument you are ostracized and put in a category where you can be examined and minimized like an insect specimen in a bottle.

And you are not allowed to be both active and capable in many things; you must stick to your category. People don't like it when someone is good in many areas--it makes them feel inferior in some way.

But the great men and women of the past never experienced such worries. Pursuing excellence in every area was to be expected, and the people we remember fondly in our history were accomplished in a broad spectrum of trades and pastimes.

I'm sad to say that people such as Ben Franklin, Thomas Jefferson and George Washington would have been thought too strange for public office. Franklin, besides being a writer and publisher, was known in Europe for being a scientist of electricity! Jefferson spent a lot of time experimenting with the tomato, then thought to be poisonous, and creating all sorts of delicious recipes in an attempt to convince others of its usefulness (and most of us thought tomato sauce came from Italy!). George Washington was not only a gifted general and statesman, but a farmer and a self-taught surveyor.

Explorers of the past, the ones who lived off of the land and dealt with the natives, were also great writers and artists--just take a peak into the logs and diaries of their adventures.

It is both a malady and a tragedy that we have been reduced to such low expectations. It will be our demise and the means to allow our new age to usher in the detestable ruler over the nations--the antichrist himself.

I love C.S. Lewis' explanation of the phenomenon, found here in his novel, The Screwtape Letters:

Democracy is the word with which you must lead them by the nose. The good work which our philological experts have already done in the corruption of human language makes it unnecessary to warn you that they should never be allowed to give this word a clear and definable meaning. They won't. It will never occur to them that democracy is properly the name of a political system, even a system of voting, and that this has only the most remote and tenuous connection with what you are trying to sell them. Nor of course must they ever be allowed to raise Aristotle's question: whether "democratic behaviour" means the behaviour that democracies like or the behaviour that will preserve a democracy. For if they did, it could hardly fail to occur to them that these need not be the same.

You are to use the word purely as an incantation; if you like, purely for its selling power. It is a name they venerate. And of course it is connected with the political ideal that men should be equally treated. You then make a stealthy transition in their minds from this political ideal to a factual belief that all men are equal. Especially the man you are working on. As a result you can use the word democracy to sanction in his thought the most degrading (and also the least enjoyable) of human feelings. You can get him to practice, not only without shame but with a positive glow of self-approval, conduct which, if undefended by the magic word, would be universally derided.
...
Under the influence of this incantation those who are in any or every way inferior can labour more wholeheartedly and successfully than ever before to pull down everyone else to their own level. But that is not all. Under the same influence, those who come, or could come, nearer to a full humanity, actually draw back from fear of being undemocratic.
...
What I want to fix your attention on is the vast, overall movement towards the discrediting, and finally the elimination, of every kind of human excellence – moral, cultural, social, or intellectual. And is it not pretty to notice how “democracy” (in the incantatory sense) is now doing for us the work that was once done by the most ancient Dictatorships, and by the same methods? You remember how one of the Greek Dictators (they called them “tyrants” then) sent an envoy to another Dictator to ask his advice about the principles of government. The second Dictator led the envoy into a field of grain, and there he snicked off with his cane the top of every stalk that rose an inch or so above the general level. The moral was plain. Allow no preeminence among your subjects. Let no man live who is wiser or better or more famous or even handsomer than the mass. Cut them all down to a level: all slaves, all ciphers, all nobodies. All equals. Thus Tyrants could practice, in a sense, “democracy.” But now “democracy” can do the same work without any tyranny other than her own. No one need now go through the field with a cane. The little stalks will now of themselves bite the tops off the big ones. The big ones are beginning to bite off their own in their desire to Be Like Stalks.
....
Of course, this would not follow unless all education became state education. But it will. That is part of the same movement. Penal taxes, designed for that purpose, are liquidating the Middle Class, the class who were prepared to save and spend and make sacrifices in order to have their children privately educated. The removal of this class, besides linking up with the abolition of education, is, fortunately, an inevitable effect of the spirit that says I’m as good as you. This was, after all, the social group which gave to the humans the overwhelming majority of their scientists, physicians, philosophers, theologians, poets, artists, composers, architects, jurists, and administrators. If ever there were a bunch of stalks that needed their tops knocked off, it was surely they. As an English politician remarked not long ago, “A democracy does not want great men.”

It would be idle to ask of such a creature whether by want it meant “need” or “like.” But you had better be clear. For here Aristotle’s question comes up again.

We, in Hell, would welcome the disappearance of democracy in the strict sense of that word, the political arrangement so called. Like all forms of government, it often works to our advantage, but on the whole less often than other forms. And what we must realize is that “democracy” in the diabolical sense (I’m as good as you, Being Like Folks, Togetherness) is the fittest instrument we could possibly have for extirpating political democracies from the face of the earth.

For “democracy” or the “democratic spirit” (diabolical sense) leads to a nation without great men, a nation mainly of subliterates, full of the cocksureness which flattery breeds on ignorance, and quick to snarl or whimper at the first sign of criticism. And that is what Hell wishes every democratic people to be. For when such a nation meets in conflict a nation where children have been made to work at school, where talent is placed in high posts, and where the ignorant mass are allowed no say at all in public affairs, only one result is possible.

(By the way, our country was not founded as a "democracy", but a republic--a vast difference)